1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 26 F.2d
  5. 26 F.2d 240 (1928)
 

IN RE DAVID J. CONROY INC.

No. 261.

26 F.2d 240 (1928)

In re DAVID J. CONROY, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 7, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earle Farwell and Barry, Wainwright, Thacher & Symmers, all of New York City, for Conroy Co.

Horace L. Cheyney and Macklin, Brown, Lenahan & Speer, all of New York City, for Huntley.

James A. Martin, Edward Elder, and Foley & Martin, all of New York City, for Arundel Corporation.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Huntley on this appeal confesses error in the decree in his favor against the Conroy, acknowledging that the causal connection is too tenuous between the tug's original fault and the lighter's damage. This leaves two questions: The Conroy's faults of navigation, and the drill's failure to recover or to mark the lost casing. How there can be any doubt of the first we confess ourselves unable to conceive. The Conroy proved herself unable to meet exactly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases