WEGMAN v. HULSE


27 F.2d 187 (1928)

WEGMAN et al. v. HULSE et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

March 6, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James D. Harris, of Fairport, N. Y., for plaintiffs.

Carnahan, Pierce & Block, of Rochester, N. Y. (George Carnahan and Wilton A. Block, both of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendants McIntosh and Hulse.

Wile, Oviatt & Gilman, of Rochester, N. Y. (Percival D. Oviatt, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendants Deininger, Hickey, Lowenthal, Riley, and Kelly.

Sutherland & Dwyer, of Rochester, N. Y. (Arthur E. Sutherland, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant Dunn.

Hubbell, Taylor, Goodwin & Moser, of Rochester, N. Y. (Clarence P. Moser, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant Lennox.

John Van Voorhis' Sons, of Rochester, N. Y. (Eugene Van Voorhis, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant Mabbett.

Harris, Beach & Matson, of Rochester, N. Y. (Willis Matson, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendants Farley and Warner.

William W. Armstrong, of Rochester, N. Y., for defendant Ingle.

Remington, Remington & Keating, of Rochester, N. Y. (Kenneth Keating, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant Argetsinger.

Warren, Shuster & Case, of Rochester, N. Y. (Stephen Warren, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendants Davenport and Barhite.

Werner, Harris & Buck, of Rochester, N. Y. (George Harris, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant Douglas.

McLean, Duffy & Kaelber, of Rochester, N. Y. (Carl Kaelber, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant Kaelber.


ADLER, District Judge.

The National Bank of Commerce of Rochester suspended business on May 17, 1924. Prior to this time negotiations had been under way with a view to bringing about the consolidation of the National Bank of Commerce and the Traders' National Bank under the charter of one of them. This plan of consolidation was abandoned. In pursuance of what seems to have been an alternative plan, the National Bank of Rochester was organized. On May 19, 1924, a contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases