1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 23 F.2d
  5. 23 F.2d 190 (1928)
 

GRAY v. MISSOURI PAC. RY. CO.

No. 4887.

23 F.2d 190 (1928)

GRAY v. MISSOURI PAC. RY. CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

January 3, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. C. Muir, of Memphis, Tenn. (Neuhardt & Muir, of Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

J. W. Canada and Edward P. Russell, both of Memphis, Tenn. (Canada, Williams & Russell, of Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before DENISON and MACK, Circuit Judges, and HICKENLOOPER, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff below complains of an instruction to find a verdict against him in his action for injuries suffered when the automobile he was driving was struck by the railroad train upon a highway crossing. Defendant claims that contributory negligence appears by the inevitable inferences from the undisputed facts. B. & O. Ry. v. Goodman, 48 S.Ct. 24, 72 L. Ed. ___, Oct. 31, 1927.

The accident happened in Arkansas, where the so-called lookout statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases