AMENDOLA v. UNITED STATES

No. 352.

26 F.2d 1015 (1928)

James AMENDOLA, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 21, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Cradock Hughes, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for plaintiff in error.

William A. De Groot, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Herbert H. Kellogg, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the United States.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This case is a second trial on the indictment before us in Amendola v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 17 F.2d 529. The evidence was the same and the judge carefully left it to the jury to say where the sale took place. They must be understood to have held that Marinelli was Amendola's agent. This was enough.

On confession of error the judgment is reversed on the first, second, and fourth counts. It is affirmed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases