IN RE BERRY

No. 2066.

26 F.2d 1012 (1928)

In re BERRY.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided June 4, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. M. Belfield, of Chicago, Ill., S. E. Darby, of New York City, and C. T. Milans and J. H. Milans, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.


VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents denying patentability to claims 1 to 5 and 13 to 15, inclusive. Claims 1 and 5 illustrate the alleged invention of applicant as follows:

"1. The combination with a rotary steam drier and an inlet therefor, of a joint between the same comprising a joint device composed in whole or in part of carbon or graphite."

"5. The combination with a rotary steam drier...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases