1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 24 F.2d
  5. 24 F.2d 989 (1928)
 

NEUSS HESSLEIN & CO. v. EDWARDS

24 F.2d 989 (1928)

NEUSS HESSLEIN & CO., Inc., v. EDWARDS, Collector of Internal Revenue.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lord, Day & Lord, Franklin Grady, and Sharon Graham, all of New York City, for plaintiff.

Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., and Samuel C. Coleman, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of New York City, for defendant.

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the plaintiff's amended complaint on the ground that it does not set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. From the complaint it appears that the plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of New York, and with its principal place of business in the city and state of New York, and was at all the times referred to and now is engaged within the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases