PER CURIAM.
Defendant in error brought this action on an insurance policy to recover a fire loss. The sole defense was an alleged cancellation of the policy the day before the fire occurred. At the close of the evidence, both parties moved for a directed verdict. The court granted plaintiff's motion, the parties having agreed upon the amount of the loss.
Our inquiry is a simple one. Was the evidence on the issue of cancellation conflicting? For, to justify...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
