L. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
We cannot accept Noe's patent as valid prior art. The plaintiff's strictures upon it may be well founded, and, if the case turned upon it, we should require the assistance of persons more adept in mechanics than ourselves. In short, the issue would have to be tried. As to the other three patents, about which no such question is raised, and which are understandable as they stand, we accept the request made...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
