1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 17 F.2d
  5. 17 F.2d 919 (1927)
 

VICK v. HENRY FORD & SON

No. 5018.

17 F.2d 919 (1927)

VICK et al. v. HENRY FORD & SON et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 7, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter C. Winslow, of Salem, Or., and Roy F. Shields, of Portland, Or., for plaintiffs in error.

Clifford B. Longley, of Detroit, Mich., and Hugh Montgomery, Everett A. Johnson, and Albert B. Ridgway, all of Portland, Or., for defendants in error.

Before GILBERT, RUDKIN, and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges.

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of involuntary nonsuit. For convenience the parties will be designated here as in the court below.

For some years prior to 1918 the plaintiffs had been extensive dealers in Ford automobiles in the state of Oregon, with retail agencies at Salem and Eugene. In June of that year the plaintiff George Vick visited Dearborn, Mich., with a view of obtaining from the defendant Ford & Son a distributing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases