1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 23 F.2d
  5. 23 F.2d 69 (1927)
 

VEATCH v. WHITE

No. 5205.

23 F.2d 69 (1927)

VEATCH et al. v. WHITE et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 28, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

I. H. Van Winkle, Atty. Gen., of Oregon, and Willis S. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Oregon, for appellants.

J. M. Scudder and John K. Kollock, both of Portland, Or., for appellees.

E. W. Anderson, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Washington, amicus curiæ.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

Appellees, plaintiffs below, under licenses issued by the state of Washington, operate fish traps in the Columbia river, and contend that the locations of the traps are within the territorial jurisdiction of that state. Defendants appellants deny that the traps are located within the jurisdiction of Washington, and allege that they are within the state of Oregon. The District Court held that the traps were located within the jurisdiction of Washington...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases