1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 21 F.2d
  5. 21 F.2d 756 (1927)
 

FIBER CONDUIT CO. v. BANKAMERIC CORPORATION

No. 32-281.

21 F.2d 756 (1927)

FIBER CONDUIT CO. v. BANKAMERIC CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 5, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Knight Bros., of New York City (Harry E. Knight and Clifton V. Edwards, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City (Dean S. Edmonds and Leslie B. Young, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants and intervener.

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

This is an action to establish the validity and to recover for the infringement of the Richardson & Coggeshall patent, No. 1,530,200, covering an underfloor conduit system for electric wiring.

The claims in suit are No. 3 and No. 20 of the patent, which describe the process thus:

"3. The steps in a method of building which comprise constructing a floor slab including a wire duct within and substantially parallel with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases