SWAN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
Counsel for the appellant has argued that the allowance of these two items was in contravention of sections 823 and 824 of the Revised Statutes (Comp. St. §§ 1375, 1378). In our view of the case, these statutes relating to taxable costs have no bearing. The sole question is whether a contempt of court was committed. If a contempt was committed, there is no doubt that the court may fine the contemnor...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
