THE MARGARET


22 F.2d 709 (1927)

THE MARGARET. THE MANCHESTER MERCHANT. HUSDON et al. v. A. H. BULL S. S. CO. et al.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

July 11, 1927.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City (John W. Crandall, of New York City, of counsel), and Rawle & Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Joseph W. Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for libelant, A. H. Bull Steamship Co.

Biddle, Paul, Dawson & Yocum, of Philadelphia, Pa. (H. Alan Dawson, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for libelants, J. H. Hudson and Manchester Liners, Limited.

Acker, Manning & Brown, of Philadelphia, Pa. (J. Thruston Manning, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for impleaded respondents Independent Pier Co. and others.


DICKINSON, District Judge.

The conclusion reached is that each and both the Manchester Merchant and the Margaret were guilty of negligence, and that the tug Harry M. Wall was not in charge of the Margaret, nor was the Independent Pier Company, the owner of the tug, responsible for the navigation of the Margaret.

Discussion.

We have entitled this cause as set forth in the libel proceeding first instituted. There are, however, three causes in one....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases