MOLYNEAUX, District Judge.
The lower court held that appellants' device does not embody patentable invention, and that, upon the assumption of the validity of the claims of said patent, the evidence does not show the same to have been infringed by the appellees' structure.
In our view, as in that of the learned trial judge, appellants' patent No. 1,550,573, when considered in the light of the prior art, does not embody patentable invention.
Appellants...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.