1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 22 F.2d
  5. 22 F.2d 509 (1927)
 

CLEVELAND, C., C. & ST. L. RY. CO. v. JACKSON

No. 4888.

22 F.2d 509 (1927)

CLEVELAND, C., C. & ST. L. RY. CO. et al. v. JACKSON.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 17, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Cary, of Chicago, Ill., and Harry N. Quigley, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Harmon, Colston, Goldsmith & Hoadly, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellants.

Robert A. Taft, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Root, Clark, Buckner, Howland & Ballantine, of New York City, and Taft, Stettinius & Hollister, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and HICKS, District Judge.

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The right of plaintiff to an injunction depends on what would be the effect of the threatened acts if permitted to be consummated. This is to be considered in the light of the Transportation Act of 1920, the main purpose of which was to permit the consolidation of railway properties in the United States into a limited number of systems in the interest of economical and efficient railway service. To that end...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases