UNITED STATES v. DE FOREST RADIO TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.

No. 549.

18 F.2d 338 (1927)

UNITED STATES et al. v. DE FOREST RADIO TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. et al.

District Court, D. Delaware.

February 15, 1927.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifton V. Edwards and Harry Knight, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., and David J. Reinhardt, U. S. Atty., of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiffs.

Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, for defendants De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Company and Lee De Forest.

Drury W. Cooper, H. Frank Wiegand (of Cooper, Kerr & Dunham), and Thomas Ewing, all of New York City, for defendants Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. and Edwin H. Armstrong.

Harry E. Dunham, of Schenectady, N. Y., and William G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del., for defendants General Electric Co. and Irving Langmuir.

William R. Ballard, of New York City, for defendant American Telephone & Telegraph Co.


MORRIS, District Judge.

In the four-party interference in the Patent Office of De Forest v. Langmuir v. Armstrong v. Meissner, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia awarded priority to De Forest (54 App. D. C. 391, 298 F. 1006), and pursuant thereto patent No. 1,507,016 was issued to De Forest on September 2, 1924. Thereafter the suit at bar was instituted, under R. S. § 4915 (Comp. St. § 9460), by Meissner and his assignee, the United States...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases