1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 21 F.2d
  5. 21 F.2d 110 (1927)
 

BROGDEX CO. v. AMERICAN FRUIT GROWERS

No. 593.

21 F.2d 110 (1927)

BROGDEX CO. v. AMERICAN FRUIT GROWERS, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware.

August 3, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Neave and Alexander C. Neave, both of New York City, Melville Church and R. F. Steward, both of Washington, D. C., and William G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

A. C. Gray and E. Ennalls Berl, both of Wilmington, Del., W. B. Morton and George E. Middleton, both of New York City, and R. T. M. McCready, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

MORRIS, District Judge.

The elimination or reduction of decay of citrus fruit during transportation to market constitutes the problem dealt with in the patent in suit, No. 1,529,461, issued March 10, 1925, to Brogden & Trowbridge, and assigned by them to Brogdex Company, the plaintiff. The decay sought to be prevented is due mainly to parisitic fungi, penicillium, or blue mold, the spores of which find lodgment and germinate, most frequently, in lesions in the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases