1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 17 F.2d
  5. 17 F.2d 1006 (1927)
 

FULTON CO. v. BISHOP & BABCOCK CO.

Nos. 4490, 4491.

17 F.2d 1006 (1927)

FULTON CO. v. BISHOP & BABCOCK CO. BISHOP & BABCOCK CO. v. FULTON CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 18, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. H. Sutton, of Washington, D. C. (W. B. Kerkam, of Washington, D. C., Bates, Macklin, Goldrick & Teare, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Mauro, Cameron, Lewis & Kerkam, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant and cross-appellee.

H. B. Fay and John F. Oberlin, both of Cleveland, Ohio (J. B. Fay, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Allen & Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee and cross-appellant.

Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and COCHRAN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

After careful review, we are satisfied with the disposition of this case made by the District Judge, and approve his treatment of the questions involved. We have held the case an unduly long time, in the expectation that we would be able to give the case a somewhat independent treatment; but it seems impracticable to do so. We therefore approve the opinion below, in which will be found a full statement as to the patents and the questions involved.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases