1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 10 F.2d
  5. 10 F.2d 983 (1926)
 

CARRANZO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 4328.

10 F.2d 983 (1926)

CARRANZO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided January 4, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Hardison, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.

F. H. Stephens and E. W. Thomas, both of Washington, D. C., for the District of Columbia.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is a writ of error to the police court of the District of Columbia, to review a decision of that court sustaining the validity of the so-called street venders police regulation, and convicting plaintiff in error, a licensed street vender, of selling peaches within the congested section of the city of Washington at a place other than that designated as a stand for licensed street venders.

The regulation in question (section 1 of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases