1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 14 F.2d
  5. 14 F.2d 920 (1926)
 

LUCEY MFG. CORPORATION v. MORLAN

No. 4783.

14 F.2d 920 (1926)

LUCEY MFG. CORPORATION v. MORLAN.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 11, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Godfrey Goldmark, of New York City, and Henry F. Prince, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Lawler & Degnan, of Los Angeles, Cal. (Oscar Lawler, James E. Degnan and Max Felix, all of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for defendant in error.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.

HUNT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The principal questions are whether the findings are sustained by the evidence and whether the conclusions support the judgment.

Among the important facts, these may be mentioned. The appointment of receivers in New York was based upon a petition filed August 17, 1923, setting forth that at the time of filing the corporation was without funds sufficient to meet its then present obligations or its obligations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases