1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 14 F.2d
  5. 14 F.2d 893 (1926)
 

CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. RY. CO. v. HARRELSON

No. 7243.

14 F.2d 893 (1926)

CHICAGO, M. & ST. P. RY. CO. v. HARRELSON.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

September 25, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard L. Hassler, of Kansas City, Mo. (C. R. Sutherland, of Chicago, Ill., and E. R. Morrison and Morrison, Nugent, Wylder & Berger, all of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

John G. Madden, of Kansas City, Mo. (T. J. Madden, Harry R. Freeman, and Madden, Freeman & Madden, all of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before KENYON and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges, and JOHN B. SANBORN, District Judge.

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error (for convenience designated in this opinion as defendant) is a common carrier of passengers and freight.

William Brooks Harrelson, a minor, who was between 9 and 10 years of age at the time of the occurrence in question, is defendant in error (but will be designated as plaintiff, the case being brought against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company by his father, Howard M. Harrelson, as his next friend...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases