PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. v. CITY OF SEATTLE

No. 530.

14 F.2d 877 (1926)

PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. v. CITY OF SEATTLE et al.

District Court, W. D. Washington, N. D.

June 7, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chadwick, McMicken, Ramsey & Rupp, of Seattle, Wash., and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Thomas J. L. Kennedy, Corp. Counsel, and Walter B. Beals and Ray Dumett, Asst. Corp. Counsels, all of Seattle, Wash., for defendants.


NETERER, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The motion to dismiss must be denied. Some cause of action is, I think, stated.

Has equity jurisdiction, or has the plaintiff a speedy and adequate remedy at law? The property in the streets of the defendant city may be classified as installed (1) by the Independent Company prior to March 9, 1912; (2) by the Sunset Company prior to January 9, 1907; (3) by the plaintiff company between March 8, 1912...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases