LANAHAN v. CLARK CAR CO.

No. 3398.

11 F.2d 820 (1926)

LANAHAN et al. v. CLARK CAR CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Application for Modification of Mandate Denied April 14, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Weller, Wicks & Wallace, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Owen J. Roberts, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.

Day & Day and William L. Day, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and Arthur O. Fording, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellee Clark Car Co.

Francis A. Wolf, Albert C. Hirsch, and John M. Freeman, all of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Watson & Freeman, of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellee Clark.

Before WOOLLEY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, District Judge.


WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a decree entered against the Clark Car Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, and Frank J. Lanahan for an accounting to the Clark Car Company, a New Jersey corporation, and to Charles H. Clark, also for the restitution of certain properties and the cancellation of certain instruments purporting to authorize their conveyance. In order that the questions of law and fact involved in the case and resolved in the decree may be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases