1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 14 F.2d
  5. 14 F.2d 805 (1926)
 

JAMES HEDDON'S SONS v. SOUTH BEND BAIT CO.

No. 3540.

14 F.2d 805 (1926)

JAMES HEDDON'S SONS, Inc., et al. v. SOUTH BEND BAIT CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 17, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel W. Banning, of Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

R. G. Lockwood and V. H. Lockwood, both of Indianapolis, Ind., for appellee.

Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.

EVAN A. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Two patents, known as the Dills patents, one a product (No. 1,323,458), and one a process (No. 1,391,670), are involved in this suit. Invalidity of both patents is asserted as the basis for the district court's decision.

The patents deal with fish baits, and the prior art is as crowded as might be expected in view of the subject-matter. In this prior art there were innumerable bait lures which resemble minnows — lures which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases