LIBERATO ET AL. v. ROYER ET AL.

No. 214.

270 U.S. 535 (1926)

LIBERATO ET AL. v. ROYER ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 12, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. William H. Neely and Paul A Kunkel, with whom Mr. George R. Hull was on the brief, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Arthur H. Hull, with whom Mr. E.E. Beidleman was on the brief, for defendants in error.


MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a claim for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act of Pennsylvania. It is for the death of the claimants' son in the employment of the defendants, without negligence or fault on the part of the latter, so far as appears. The son died unmarried and without issue, and the claimants, the plaintiffs in error, were wholly dependent upon him for support;...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases