1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 11 F.2d
  5. 11 F.2d 774 (1926)
 

WITTEN v. OAK RUBBER CO.

No. 4471.

11 F.2d 774 (1926)

WITTEN et al. v. OAK RUBBER CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 11, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Floyd E. Shannon, of Akron, Ohio, for appellants.

A. J. Hudson, of Cleveland, Ohio (Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.

Before DENISON, DONAHUE, and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit for infringement by defendant of United States letters patent 1,484,919, issued to the plaintiff February 26, 1924. Claims 3, 4, 8, 9, and 10 are involved, and the defense is invalidity for lack of patentable novelty. The patent is for a process for coloring rubber, and as related to the facts in this case toy rubber balloons.

The primary object of the invention, as set out in the specifications, is to provide a new and improved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases