1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 13 F.2d
  5. 13 F.2d 705 (1926)
 

MONROE BODY CO. v. HERZOG

No. 4425.

13 F.2d 705 (1926)

MONROE BODY CO. et al. v. HERZOG et al.

Circuit Count of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 10, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chappell & Earl and Fred L. Chappell, all of Kalamazoo, Mich., for appellants.

Whittemore, Hulbert, Whittemore & Belknap and William J. Belknap, all of Detroit, Mich. (Clarence B. Zewadski, of Detroit, Mich., of counsel), for appellees.

Before DENISON, MACK, and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges.

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

After the mandate went down upon the second former appeal in this case (Monroe Co. v. Herzog [C. C. A.] 2 F.2d 837), plaintiff began a proceeding in contempt against defendant. It was entitled in the equity case, alleged that the defendant had deliberately and willfully violated the injunction by making more infringing machines than the interlocutory order permitted, and had further violated the injunction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases