1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 269 U.S.
  5. 269 U.S. 411 (1926)
 

UNITED STATES v. RIVER ROUGE CO.

No. 3.

269 U.S. 411 (1926)

UNITED STATES v. RIVER ROUGE IMPROVEMENT COMPANY ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 4, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Solicitor General Beck and Mr. Alfred Lucking, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Howell Van Auken, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, was on the brief, for the United States.

Messrs. Selden Dickinson and Charles A. Wagner, with whom Messrs. Henry M. Campbell and Elliott G. Stevenson were on the brief, for defendants in error.

Mr. Paul B. Moody filed a supplemental brief for defendants in error, Forman Company and Ramsby.

MR. JUSTICE SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

Pursuant to an appropriation for the improvement of the Rouge River, Michigan, made in the Rivers and Harbors Act of August 8, 1917,1 the United States filed in the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan five petitions for the condemnation of numerous parcels of riparian land needed for such improvement, and, also, of a gas main...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases