1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 13 F.2d
  5. 13 F.2d 532 (1926)
 

PENNSYLVANIA CEMENT CO. v. BRADLEY CONTRACTING CO.

No. 394.

13 F.2d 532 (1926)

PENNSYLVANIA CEMENT CO. v. BRADLEY CONTRACTING CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 12, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Curtin, of New York City (Wesley S. Sawyer, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Leo Oppenheimer, of New York City (Samuel H. Kaufman, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before HOUGH, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully considered the question whether William Bradley did or did not substantially convert the indebtedness of Bradley Company to himself into preferred stock of that concern. It is almost wholly a question of fact, and one on which Mr. E. H. Childs, the master, and Thacher, J., have agreed in considered opinions. We do not think it necessary to add anything to their conclusions on the main issue, and agree in rejecting Bradley's claim.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases