PROTEX SIGNAL CO. v. FENIGER

No. 4282.

11 F.2d 43 (1926)

PROTEX SIGNAL CO. v. FENIGER et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 8, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. J. Hudson, of Cleveland, Ohio (Thurston, Kwis & Hudson, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.

Charles E. Brock, of Cleveland, Ohio (Hull, Brock & West, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees.

Before DENISON, DONAHUE, and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

It is unnecessary to discuss in detail the prior patent art. It is sufficient to say that a careful consideration of all of the prior patents relating particularly to "stop signals" introduced in evidence and the testimony in reference to a large number of others of the same character, not only compels the conclusion that none of them anticipate Kroehle, but also emphasizes the fact that many competitors were endeavoring, without success, to produce an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases