1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 12 F.2d
  5. 12 F.2d 511 (1926)
 

ELECTRO BLEACHING GAS CO. v. PARADON ENGINEERING CO.

No. 369.

12 F.2d 511 (1926)

ELECTRO BLEACHING GAS CO. et al. v. PARADON ENGINEERING CO., Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 17, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mayer, Warfield & Watson, of New York City (Lawrence Bristol and C. A. L. Massie, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Wood, Molloy & France and Loren N. Wood, all of New York City, for appellee Electro Bleaching Gas Co.

Cooper, Kerr & Dunham and Drury W. Cooper, all of New York City, for appellee Wallace & Tiernan Co.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MACK, Circuit Judges.

HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The validity of this patent has been sustained, not only by Campbell, District Judge, in the court below, but in the District Court for the Western District of Missouri by Van Valkenburgh, District Judge. Electro Bleaching Gas Co. v. Miller, 264 F. 429. In these opinions the history of Ornstein's patent and the development of water purification by the introduction of chlorine are set forth with thoroughness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases