1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 11 F.2d
  5. 11 F.2d 478 (1926)
 

PARAMOUNT TEXTILE MACHINERY CO. v. SNYDER

No. 3376.

11 F.2d 478 (1926)

PARAMOUNT TEXTILE MACHINERY CO. v. SNYDER.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

March 2, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund H. Parry, of Washington, D. C., and Charles H. Howson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Fraley & Paul, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Henry N. Paul, of Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This patent case concerns the art of shaping and drying hosiery. In the antedating practice after hosiery came from the dyeing or bleaching baths and had been subjected to the centrifugal action of a water-extracting machine called a "whizzer," it still remained damp. In that condition it was "boarded" or drawn by an operator over a wooden shape and then placed in a furnace. These successive steps dried, creased, and ironed the stocking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases