IN RE GILBOUGH


13 F.2d 462 (1926)

In re GILBOUGH.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 29, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Cahill, of New York City, for petitioner.

Ben Herzberg, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, opposed.

Before HOUGH, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.


HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

As at present amended, Judicial Code, § 128 (Comp. St. Supp. 1925, § 1120), gives to this court jurisdiction to review "final decisions" of the District Courts "in all cases save where a direct review" may be had in the Supreme Court under section 238 (Comp. St. § 1215), and it is quite evident that that section does not permit direct review.

It is observable that section 128 gives to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases