1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 11 F.2d
  5. 11 F.2d 453 (1926)
 

WALDES v. SCHALL

No. 12.

11 F.2d 453 (1926)

Jindrich WALDES, Ignatz Puc, Edward Merzinger and Sigmund Waldes, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Waldes & Co., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. William SCHALL and Carl Muller, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Muller, Schall & Co., Defendants Appellees.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided January 15, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burnstine & Geist, of New York City (Julius M. Mayer, Henry C. Burnstine, and Frederick P. Warfield, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Avery & Whiting, of New York City (Jay E. Whiting and Earl B. Barnes, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

HOUGH, MANTON and HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We are entirely satisfied with the findings of fact made by the master. They dispose of the case, and decree [11 F.2d 444] is affirmed, with costs, on the master...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases