1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 13 F.2d
  5. 13 F.2d 429 (1926)
 

UNITED STATES v. TEXAS & N. O. R. CO.

Nos. 700, 765.

13 F.2d 429 (1926)

UNITED STATES v. TEXAS & N. O. R. CO. et al. (two cases).

District Court, S. D. Texas, at Houston.

May 8, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. M. Holden, Dist. Atty., and Howell Ward, Asst. Dist. Atty., both of Houston, Tex., for the United States.

Garrison & Watson, of Houston, Tex. (R. L. Arterbury, of Houston, Tex., of counsel), for defendants.

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

In the above cases the United States government, as plaintiff, has charged the defendants with a violation of the act of Congress known as the Safety Appliance Act, approved March 2, 1893 (27 Stat. 531), as amended by an act approved April 1, 1896 (29 Stat. 85), as amended by an act approved March 2, 1903 (32 Stat. 943), and as modified by an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission of June 6, 1910; the original act purported to have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases