PER CURIAM.
Upon the rehearing of this case it was again exhaustively briefed and argued, and we have again read and considered the determinate evidence and the briefs, and are not convinced that there was any error prejudicial to the bank in the trial or judgment herein, except that by mistake the amount stated in the judgment, as counsel for the parties agree, was $600 in excess of the amount which it should have been.
It is accordingly ordered that the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.