FORD HYDRO-ELECTRIC CO. v. NEELY

No. 3660.

13 F.2d 361 (1926)

FORD HYDRO-ELECTRIC CO. v. NEELY et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

May 28, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wm. Ryan, of Madison, Wis., for plaintiff in error.

Wm. P. Belden, of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant in error.

Before EVANS, PAGE, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error brought proceedings to condemn, for water power purposes, land owned by defendants in error. The question as to the amount of compensation to be allowed for the taking was the only contested question upon the trial, and this was submitted to a jury.

As the Seventh Amendment provides, "No fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases