CROUCH v. UNITED STATES

No. 4751.

13 F.2d 348 (1926)

CROUCH v. UNITED STATES et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 14, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Austin Lewis, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Charles F. Parsons, U. S. Atty., of Honolulu, Hawaii, George J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., of San Francisco, Cal., and Col. Gordon N. Kimball, of San Francisco, Cal. (T. J. Sheridan, Asst. U. S. Atty., Lt.-Col. William Penn Humphreys, and Maj. Walter M. Krimbill, all of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellees.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.


GILBERT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

There can be no question but that the appellant was triable by a general court-martial under the second and twelfth Articles of War and that the court had jurisdiction of his person. While a court-martial is a court of special and limited jurisdiction, its proceedings, when confirmed as provided by law, are not open to review in other courts, except upon an affirmative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases