1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 12 F.2d
  5. 12 F.2d 348 (1926)
 

NEW YORK & CUBA MAIL S. S. CO. v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 314-316.

12 F.2d 348 (1926)

NEW YORK & CUBA MAIL S. S. CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. FLANNERY, GUINAN & MORAN, Inc., v. NEW YORK & CUBA MAIL S. S. CO. et al. (two cases).

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 3, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City (Charles W. Hagen and Leonard Matteson, both of New York City, of counsel), for Flannery, Guinan & Moran, Inc.

Burlingham, Veeder, Masten & Feary, of New York City (Chauncey I. Clark and Eugene Underwood, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for New York & Cuba Mail S. S. Co.

Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Horace M. Gray, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City), opposed.

Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.

HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Viewed under the "pier end" statute, we cannot think this case one of legal difficulty. The construction of that act was settled in The Chauncey M. Depew, 139 F. 236, 71 C. C. A. 362, holding that, while the statute did not govern the right of recovery in admiralty, the regulation was within the power of the state, and the violation thereof was a fault; wherefore, if that fault contributed to the collision,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases