BENTEL v. UNITED STATES

No. 396.

13 F.2d 327 (1926)

BENTEL v. UNITED STATES. AMOS v. SAME.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 17, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David V. Cahill, of New York City, for plaintiff in error Bentel.

Gallert, Hilborn & Raphael and David J. Gallert, all of New York City, for plaintiff in error Amos.

Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Frederic R. Coudert and David P. Seigel, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and HAND, Circuit Judges.


HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Of the writ taken by Bentel it is almost enough to say that we think it wholly without merit.

There are assignments of error relating to the admission of evidence, concerning which we think the matters complained of were either discretionary with the trial judge, or illustrate the common complaint of counsel who start an inquiry and feel hurt when opponents pursue the matter to the disadvantage of him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases