BENTEL v. UNITED STATES

No. 396.

13 F.2d 327 (1926)

BENTEL v. UNITED STATES. AMOS v. SAME.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 17, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David V. Cahill, of New York City, for plaintiff in error Bentel.

Gallert, Hilborn & Raphael and David J. Gallert, all of New York City, for plaintiff in error Amos.

Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Frederic R. Coudert and David P. Seigel, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and HAND, Circuit Judges.


HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Of the writ taken by Bentel it is almost enough to say that we think it wholly without merit.

There are assignments of error relating to the admission of evidence, concerning which we think the matters complained of were either discretionary with the trial judge, or illustrate the common complaint of counsel who start an inquiry and feel hurt when opponents pursue the matter to the disadvantage of him...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases