1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 13 F.2d
  5. 13 F.2d 317 (1926)
 

IN RE CARTLIDGE

No. 1842.

13 F.2d 317 (1926)

In re CARTLIDGE.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided June 1, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. H. Boyden, of Washington, D. C., and L. A. Maxson, of Claremont, N. H., for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and SMITH, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office rejecting the claims of an alleged divisional application relating to coal-mining machines. The grounds of the rejection were: First, that the claims are for substantially the same invention covered by appellant's patent No. 1,538,684, of which this application is claimed to be a division; second, that the claims are unpatentable over the prior art; and, third, that they do not adequately define...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases