THE MILWAUKEE BRIDGE


15 F.2d 249 (1926)

THE MILWAUKEE BRIDGE.

District Court, S. D. New York.

August 26, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hickox & Keating and Bigham, Englar & Jones, all of New York City (D. Roger Englar, Frank A. Bernero, Alfred Ogden, and F. Herbert Prem, all of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (William E. Collins, of New York City, of counsel), for claimant respondent.

Choate, Larocque & Mitchell, of New York City (Joseph Larocque, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent Cory Bros. & Co., Limited.

Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed, of New York City (Theodore Kiendl, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent American Trading Co.

Rushmore, Bisbee & Stern, of New York City (Bruce R. Tuttle, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent Butterworth-Judson Corporation.


THACHER, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

There can be no recovery for damage suffered after the discharge of the cargo, unless some wrongful act chargeable to the vessel is shown to have been the proximate cause thereof. Seeking to show that the action of the local authorities in condemning the entire shipment was the natural consequence of wrongful acts chargeable to the vessel, the libelant insists that the vessel was under a duty to separate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases