1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 14 F.2d
  5. 14 F.2d 247 (1926)
 

RHODES v. FREEMAN

No. 4353.

14 F.2d 247 (1926)

RHODES et al. v. FREEMAN et al.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided June 10, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. D. Detwiler and W. A. Coombe, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs in error.

A. H. Bell and P. H. Marshall, both of Washington, D. C., for defendants in error.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The receivers of the District Guaranty Corporation sued Freeman and Dunham in the municipal court to recover the sum of $150, claimed to be due upon a certain promissory note, which was part of the receivership assets. Dunham denied liability, claiming, among other things, that he was only an indorser upon the note, and had been released by the omission of demand and notice. Freeman did not deny liability upon the note, but filed a set-off in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases