1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 22 F.2d
  5. 22 F.2d 208 (1926)
 

BOURKE v. BUEGELEISEN

22 F.2d 208 (1926)

BOURKE et al. v. BUEGELEISEN.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 22, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frederick P. Randolph, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Dean, Fairbank, Obrieght & Hirsch, of New York City (Clair W. Fairbank, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

THACHER, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

There is nothing in the claims not found in the prior art, except the "integral rocking means at the fulcrum of said lever"; that is, the integral side projections which support the lever upon the plate, and the integral rounded projections at its fulcrum which allow it to turn in the socket. Bourke's device intrinsically is no better than the devices of the prior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases