ALCOHOL WAREHOUSE CORPORATION v. CANFIELD

No. 195.

11 F.2d 214 (1926)

ALCOHOL WAREHOUSE CORPORATION v. CANFIELD, Federal Prohibition Director, et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 8, 1926.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred D. Van Buren, of New York City, for appellant.

Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (U. S. Grant, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before MANTON, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.


HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

We decline to consider this case upon the merits, because of the absence of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue as a defendant. The cause is of a class now well recognized in the decisions of the Supreme Court, where an official is charged with duties under a statute, which he may and does execute by means of deputies, and where, whatever the former practice, courts will not now review the conduct of the deputies...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases