1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 11 F.2d
  5. 11 F.2d 209 (1926)
 

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MFG. CO. v. PRECISE MFG. CORP.

Nos. 234, 235.

11 F.2d 209 (1926)

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MFG. CO. et al. v. PRECISE MFG. CORPORATION. SAME v. CHAS. A. BRANSTON, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 8, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darby & Darby, of New York City (Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and John S. Powers, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for appellant Precise Mfg. Corporation.

Popp & Powers, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and John S. Powers, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for appellant Chas. A. Branston, Inc.

Charles Neave and Stephen H. Philbin, both of New York City, for appellees.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

These cases will be disposed of in one opinion. Injunctions pendente lite were granted, after argument, supported by affidavits. The patents in suit are the Fessenden heterodyne, No. 1,050,441, No. 1,050,728, and Armstrong regenerative patent, No. 1,113,149. The Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company is the owner of the patents, and the Radio Corporation of America is the licensee. All the patents have been held valid by this court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases