1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 16 F.2d
  5. 16 F.2d 121 (1926)
 

LAMBERT TRANSP. CO. v. FURNESS-WITHY & CO.

No. 94.

16 F.2d 121 (1926)

LAMBERT TRANSP. CO., Inc., v. FURNESS-WITHY & CO., Limited, et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 6, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Martin and Foley & Martin, all of New York City, for appellant.

Kirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, of New York City (L. De Grove Potter and John J. Heckman, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before HOUGH, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We do not think this cause illustrates any point of law or presents any serious question of fact. We are of opinion that libelant's boat was injured by the negligence of the Bay Ridge Company.

The boat was not chartered by Furness-Withy & Co., and that concern was guilty of no negligence. Representatives of the libelant protested to Bay Ridge Company's stevedores against their negligent acts; the protests were disregarded. We think libelant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases