1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 14 F.2d
  5. 14 F.2d 104 (1926)
 

EMLENTON REFINING CO. v. CHAMBERS

No. 3435.

14 F.2d 104 (1926)

EMLENTON REFINING CO. v. CHAMBERS.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

July 8, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Mullin, of Kane, Pa., W. Pitt Gifford, of Erie, Pa., Mullin & Woods, of Kane, Pa., Frampton & Courtney, of Oil City, Pa., and Gunnison, Fish, Gifford & Chapin, of Erie, Pa., for appellant.

J. Thurston Manning, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City, Edmund C. Breene, of Oil City, Pa., and Conlen, Acker, Manning & Brown, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON and WOOLLEY, Circuit Judges, and DICKINSON, District Judge.

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

Three suits involving the same contracts were instituted against the defendant by the same plaintiffs in different characters. They were brought in the order and, abbreviated for convenience, were entitled as follows:

(1) Chambers, for the use of Adams, v. Emlenton Refining Company.

(2) Adams (averring that Chambers was his agent) v. Emlenton Refining Company.

(3) Chambers, for the use of Adams, v. Emlenton Refining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases