1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 14 F.2d
  5. 14 F.2d 1021 (1926)
 

CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO. v. LINSTEAD

No. 4626.

14 F.2d 1021 (1926)

CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO., Plaintiff in Error, v. Katherine LINSTEAD, Executrix, Defendant in Error.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 9, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank M. Tracy, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Galvin & Tracy, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

John W. Cowell, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Ratterman & Cowell, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before DENISON, DONAHUE, and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We are unable effectively to distinguish the facts of this case from those of Hull v. Philadelphia, etc., Ry., 252 U.S. 475, 40 S.Ct. 358, 64 L. Ed. 670, an opinion which apparently was not brought to the attention of the trial court. It thus becomes necessary to reverse the judgment and remand for further proceedings. We express no opinion as to whether an amendment pursuant to the rule of the Kinney Case,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases