1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 13 F.2d
  5. 13 F.2d 1022 (1926)
 

LANGSTAFF v. LUCAS

No. 4582.

13 F.2d 1022 (1926)

George LANGSTAFF, Plaintiff in Error, v. Robert H. LUCAS, Collector, Defendant in Error.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 30, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chas. K. Wheeler, of Paducah, Ky. (Wheeler & Hughes and Bernard Posey, all of Paducah, Ky., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

Floyd F. Toomey, Sp. Atty., of Washington, D. C. (W. S. Ball, U. S. Atty., of Louisville, Ky., and A. W. Gregg, Solicitor of Internal Revenue, and Floyd F. Toomey, Sp. Atty. Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before DENISON, DONAHUE, and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After considering carefully the reasons urged against it, we feel satisfied to affirm the judgment (9 F.2d 691), and we do so upon the reasoning and conclusions of the District Judge. Although the half interest in the corporate assets which came to Langstaff was within the broad definition of "dividend" in section 201 (a), being Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 6336 1/8b, yet the transaction was the very one specifically...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases